Difference between revisions of "Agile NeoRAD"
m (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Gartner defines Agile NeoRAD as a "type of project approach applies agile methods, such as extreme programming." Models are sketches, rather than first-class development artifacts. There are few concerns about standardization in terms of reusing analysis and | + | Gartner defines Agile NeoRAD as a "type of project approach that applies agile methods, such as extreme programming." Models are sketches, rather than first-class development artifacts. There are a few concerns about standardization in terms of reusing analysis and design patterns and frameworks. There is little model-based code generation.<ref>[http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/agile-neorad What is Agile NeoRAD? -Gartner]</ref> |
| − | Agile (NeoRAD) is similar in concept to the original rapid | + | Agile (NeoRAD) is similar in concept to the original rapid application development (RAD) approach popularized in the 1990s, agile methods go further in accelerating feature deliveries - sometimes called "sprints" — from the three- to six-month time frames typical of RAD, to monthly or even weekly delivery. In both, a small, collaborative team dedicated wholly (or almost so) to the project works together, in one location, on the project. Many large AD organizations have succeeded in blending a NeoRAD approach with such other approaches as waterfall, model-driven, and iterative in a flexible software process architecture to yield continuously high quality and customer satisfaction ratings<ref>[ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/in/Rational_selected_the_pmo_it_control_tower_fil_168947.pdf Understanding Agile NeoRAD -IBM]</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ==See Also== | ||
| + | *[[Application Development]] | ||
| + | *[[Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)]] | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
===Further Reading=== | ===Further Reading=== | ||
| − | * | + | *[https://prescriptiveanalyticsblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/24/agile-neorad-how-to-improvise-and-respond-to-agile-neorad-projects-quickly-and-frequently/ Agile NeoRAD: how to improvise and respond to Agile NeoRAD projects quickly and frequently -Prescriptive Analytics] |
| − | + | *[https://dynamiccreativeoptimization.wordpress.com/2017/02/26/agile-neorad-how-to-qualify-and-determine-if-new-equipment-or-products-are-required-to-facilitate-agile-neorad-delivery-for-example-are-new-tools-needed/ Agile NeoRAD: how to qualify and determine if new equipment or products are required to facilitate Agile NeoRAD delivery -Dynamic Creative Optiization] | |
Revision as of 16:10, 8 December 2022
Gartner defines Agile NeoRAD as a "type of project approach that applies agile methods, such as extreme programming." Models are sketches, rather than first-class development artifacts. There are a few concerns about standardization in terms of reusing analysis and design patterns and frameworks. There is little model-based code generation.[1]
Agile (NeoRAD) is similar in concept to the original rapid application development (RAD) approach popularized in the 1990s, agile methods go further in accelerating feature deliveries - sometimes called "sprints" — from the three- to six-month time frames typical of RAD, to monthly or even weekly delivery. In both, a small, collaborative team dedicated wholly (or almost so) to the project works together, in one location, on the project. Many large AD organizations have succeeded in blending a NeoRAD approach with such other approaches as waterfall, model-driven, and iterative in a flexible software process architecture to yield continuously high quality and customer satisfaction ratings[2]
See Also
References