Difference between revisions of "Guard Dog Theory"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| − | ==See Also== | + | == See Also == |
| + | *[[IT Strategy (Information Technology Strategy)]] | ||
| + | *[[IT Governance]] | ||
| + | *[[Enterprise Architecture]] | ||
| + | *[[Chief Information Officer (CIO)]] | ||
| + | *[[IT Sourcing (Information Technology Sourcing)]] | ||
| + | *[[IT Operations (Information Technology Operations)]] | ||
| + | *[[E-Strategy]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 15: | ||
| − | ==References== | + | |
| + | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 8 March 2024
The Guard Dog Theory suggests that mass media and journalists basically support dominant political institutions, major economic groups, and their values, but can and do criticize those organizations, especially when elite class members of those groups violate system values or when they criticize each other. It is quite different from lap dog journalism (where the journalist is totally loyal to the elite class). In this scenario, journalists provide support for the existing power structures, even while occasionally producing content critical of it and the elites.[1]
See Also
- IT Strategy (Information Technology Strategy)
- IT Governance
- Enterprise Architecture
- Chief Information Officer (CIO)
- IT Sourcing (Information Technology Sourcing)
- IT Operations (Information Technology Operations)
- E-Strategy