Difference between revisions of "Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM)"
(Software Engineering Institute (SEI) 's Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM) is a five-step method for analyzing software architectures.) |
m (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Software Engineering Institute (SEI) 's Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM) is a five-step method for analyzing software architectures. The main activities involved in the SAAM are enumerated are:<br /> | + | [[Software]] Engineering Institute (SEI) 's Software [[Architecture]] Analysis Method (SAAM) is a five-step method for analyzing software architectures. The main activities involved in the SAAM are enumerated are:<br /> |
1. Characterize a canonical functional partitioning for the domain.<br /> | 1. Characterize a canonical functional partitioning for the domain.<br /> | ||
2. Map the functional partitioning onto the architecture’s structural decomposition.<br /> | 2. Map the functional partitioning onto the architecture’s structural decomposition.<br /> | ||
| − | 3. Choose a set of quality attributes with which to assess the architecture.<br /> | + | 3. Choose a set of [[quality]] attributes with which to assess the architecture.<br /> |
4. Choose a set of concrete tasks which test the desired quality attributes.<br /> | 4. Choose a set of concrete tasks which test the desired quality attributes.<br /> | ||
5. Evaluate the degree to which each architecture provides support for each task. | 5. Evaluate the degree to which each architecture provides support for each task. | ||
Revision as of 18:25, 6 February 2021
Software Engineering Institute (SEI) 's Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM) is a five-step method for analyzing software architectures. The main activities involved in the SAAM are enumerated are:
1. Characterize a canonical functional partitioning for the domain.
2. Map the functional partitioning onto the architecture’s structural decomposition.
3. Choose a set of quality attributes with which to assess the architecture.
4. Choose a set of concrete tasks which test the desired quality attributes.
5. Evaluate the degree to which each architecture provides support for each task.